Question for our visitors

6 Comments + Add Comment

• 
  Sarika December 15, 2009 at 1:30 pm

  I usually only post candids of actors when they are working (on a film set), but do you think there’s a good chance that Amy will attend an event with her baby bump and you can post pictures from that? If not, I don’t think a few candids is a huge invasion of privacy (she is an actress after all). Your intentions are good :) You’re excited for her and obviously care about her privacy.
• 
  Shannon December 15, 2009 at 1:38 pm

  I think if Amy looks happy and content it would be fine to post them but if she looks distressed/unhappy you probably shouldn’t post them.
• 
  mac December 15, 2009 at 2:10 pm

  Tough call.

  Why not treat the pregnancy photos like you did any other candid photo in the past? (-post only the more respectful ones or those where she appears not to mind). Stricter guidelines may need to apply, though, on baby photos when the kid is born.

  Just my $.02 ;)
• 
  Katherine December 15, 2009 at 2:33 pm

  If it looks like she’s not really wanting to be pictured, i.e. looking away or sort of peering out from behind someone else, then I’d say don’t post it.
  On the other hand, if she’s smiling and looking at the camera and all happy then I would love to see it! =)
  I feel the same way though; I wouldn’t want to feel like I’m invading her privacy. ;)
• 
  Christine December 15, 2009 at 7:04 pm

  You not posting paparazzi pictures won’t make them stop taking them of her, so I think you might as well share with her fans how beautiful her stages of pregnancy will be and I know this is maybe the most popular fansite of Amy.
• 
  Sarah December 16, 2009 at 10:22 pm

  its good you think about amy’s privacy. although as other have already stated, it would be nice if you post them if she looks happy in the photos, but if shes looking distressed or unhappy, maybe not a good idea.